首页> 外文OA文献 >'Fell' primes 'fall', but does 'bell' prime 'ball'? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes
【2h】

'Fell' primes 'fall', but does 'bell' prime 'ball'? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes

机译:“掉落”会引发“跌倒”,但“钟声”会引发“球”吗?带有不规则变形底漆的蒙版底漆

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recent masked priming experiments have brought to light a morphological level of analysis that is exclusively based on the orthographic appearance of words, so that it breaks down corner into corn- and -er, as well as dealer into deal- and -er (Rastle, Davis, & New, 2004). Being insensitive to semantic factors, this morpho-orthographic segmentation process cannot capture the morphological relationship between irregularly inflected words and their base forms (e.g., fell-fall, bought-buy); hence, the prediction follows that these words should not facilitate each other in masked priming experiments. However, the first experiment described in the present work demonstrates that fell does facilitate fall more than orthographically matched (e.g., fill) and unrelated control words (e.g., hope). Experiments 2 and 3 also show that this effect cannot be explained through orthographic sub-regularities that characterize many irregular inflections, as no priming arose when unrelated words showing the same orthographic patterns were tested (e.g., tell-tall vs. toll-tall). These results highlight the existence of a second higher-level source of masked morphological priming; we propose that this second source of priming is located at the lemma level, where inflected words (but not derived words) share their representation irrespective of orthographic regularity. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:最近的蒙版启动实验已经揭示了一种形态学分析水平,该分析水平完全基于单词的正字形外观,因此它可以将角落分解为玉米和-er,而经销商分解为交易和-er(Rastle,戴维斯&纽,2004年)。由于对语义因素不敏感,这种词法拼写分割过程无法捕获不规则变形词及其基本形式(例如跌倒,买入)之间的形态关系;因此,可以预见到,这些单词在蒙版启动实验中不应该相互促进。但是,当前工作中描述的第一个实验表明,跌倒确实比倒拼匹配(例如,填充)和无关的控制字词(例如,希望)确实有助于跌倒。实验2和3还表明,无法通过以许多不规则拐点为特征的正字法次正则来解释这种影响,因为当测试显示相同正字法模式的不相关字词时(例如,高大与收费),没有引发词。这些结果突出了掩盖形态引发的第二个更高层次的来源的存在。我们建议,第二个启动源位于引理级别,其中无论字词的正则性如何,屈折词(但不是派生词)都共享其表示形式。 (C)2010 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号